|
b. 464-465
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||
|
b. 464
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
It seems that the accents here and in bar 469 were misplaced in FE. In the discussed bar, the mark was probably supposed to concern the crotchet in the L.H. Such an interpretation was adopted in GE3; however, it is only one of a few possibilities, out of which all the major ones are represented in the sources. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 464-465
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We consider the shorter slur in bar 465 to be inaccurate, on the basis of comparison with similar motifs, and we prolong it in the main text after bar 464. In GE3, both slurs were changed to those present in the sources in analogous bars 456-457. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 465
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
As in many other situations, the compliance between the fingering of EE and FEH does not add to the small likelihood of the indications being authentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||
|
b. 465
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with analogous bar 463 points to a possible oversight of an accent at the beginning of the bar. Our two suggestions correspond to two kinds of accents included in the sources in bars 463 and 465. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
