|
b. 605
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 605
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing staccato mark in A (→FE→EE) seems to be an oversight of Chopin, since corresponding marks are present in the three remaining, analogous b. 22, 46 and 154. The dot in FC seems to have been added after the remaining signs (note and slur) had already been written. Due to very numerous unquestionably Chopinesque additions in FC, it is also here that we can assume Chopin's correction. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 605
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in analogous b. 154, the indication category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , fz – f |
|||||||||||
|
b. 606-610
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The #E - without slurs - most probably copies the initial stage of the noatation of motifs of LH in bars 606 and 609-610. In the main text we present the consistent notation of slurs in GC (→GE) and FE. Cf. bars 573-574 and 577-578. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
|
b. 606-620
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
For the main text we adopt cresc. - - - based on GC (→GE). In EE it is divided into syllables (it is the common manner of EE) and extends further only to abruptly end without the last syllable "do" - in b. 615, which is the last on the page. The placement of the first two syllables in bars 606 i 613 suggests that the whole indication should extend as far as b. 620. In FE there is no marking at all, which is most probably Chopin's omission while writing hastily [A2] (cf. annotation to b. 373) category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
in 
in 
