Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 606

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In FE, the last note in the R.H. is a semiquaver, which is inconsistent with the demisemiquaver rest that precedes it. We correct this mistake in an obvious manner by shortening that note to a demisemiquaver. In GE and EE, the place was revised in the same way.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors

b. 606-607

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

Just like in b. 23-24, in FE (→EE) this pair of bars was replaced with a double bar with a two-bar rest marked with the digit 2. In GE1 the bars were not combined, yet in each of them both rests were provided with the digits 1. In the main text we preserve the notation of A (→FC), restored also in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , FE revisions

b. 607-611

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Short accents in EE

Long accents in FE, probable reading of GC

Possible short accents in GC (→GE)

..

In bars 607 and 611 in EE, there are (short) accents both in the LH and RH parts. It is uncertain that such a version is authentic (cf. 606-620). The accents in GC (marked in bars 575 and 579) may be interpreted both as long or short. In GE they were read as short ones. For the main text we adopt the long accents of FE

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE revisions

b. 607

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fifth in FE, literal reading

Only minim in GE

Appoggiatura & minim in EE

Acciaccatura – our alternative suggestion

..

The vague and most probably erroneous notation of FE was probably supposed to look like the one applied two bars later – a d2 minim preceded by an a2 grace note. We adopt this obvious interpretation in the main text; it was applied already in EE. In turn, the version of GE may be the original version, completed by Chopin in the last proofreading of FE. We give a short grace note as an acceptable variant – see bar 609.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 607-608

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No slurs in FE (→GE1GE2)

Slurs in EE & GE3

..

Omission of two subsequent slurs in a sequence of similar figures of accompaniment must be an inaccuracy, although it is uncertain whether it was committed in FE (→GE1GE2) or still in [A]. This is how it was already assessed in EE and GE3 (see also bar 599 and 611).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions