Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 573-584

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In GC the bars are marked with consecutive letters from to m. The letters are then used to mark bars 605-616 in short.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Abbreviated notation of A

b. 573

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No sign in FE (→GE,EE)

Slur ending suggested by the editors

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 573-599

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

category imprint:

b. 573-576

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No marks in FC (→GE)

..

A missing accent at the beginning of each of these 4 bars may be an oversight of Fontana. According to us, it is, however, more likely that Chopin added the accents in A after FC had already been prepared.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Corrections in A , Errors of FC

b. 573-576

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No marks in FE (→EE)

..

In the main text we give 6 staccato dots, written in A over the 3-crotchet motifs. The absence of the dots in FE (→EE) is probably an oversight; the engraver could have been misled by the placement of the dots in A, i.e. close to the dashes marking the range of calando. In turn, it is unclear how the missing dots in b. 574 and 576 in GE are to be explained, since one can imagine both an oversight and a revision. However, there is no doubt that the doubled marks under the notes are a revision. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions