|
b. 577
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The grace note in the form of a small crotchet is most probably a mistake of FE – cf. bar 250. A similar conclusion was reached already by the revisers of GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 577
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Different sound of the 4th quaver than in all analogous bars (bar 226, 234, 250 and 585; cf. also bar 65, 73 and 89) could have been intended by Chopin, e.g. with regard to a slightly different shape of the accompaniment line in the next bar. However, since a mistake of the engraver cannot be excluded, we alternatively suggest a version that is analogous to the remaining bars. Mistakes consisting in adjusting figurations to a regular scheme, particularly when it appeared in similar figures (identical even quavers are present in bars 573-575), are psychologically justified and can be encountered in Chopin's pieces on a number of occasions – cf. e.g. bar 594 or 542-543. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 577-585
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Taking into account the explicit harmonic change on the 3rd beat of bar 577, it seems highly unlikely that Chopin would have envisaged the entire bar performed with one pedal. Therefore, the category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 579-580
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we preserve the version of A (→FC), since there are no indications that Chopin was removing dots in FE or adding them in GE. However, it is uncertain whether the missing dot in b. 580 was intentional, since the bar opens a new line of text, which would often contribute to various inaccuracies of notation. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 581-588
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Accents in these bars may be interpreted as long (especially in FE, and probably in GC) or short (EE and GE, more probbale in GC). For the main text we adopt short accents because of the notation including rests at the end if each bar - if Chopin wanted to suggest longer sounds, he should have written crotchets. As and additional argument to support this view, we see that in FE in bars 613-616, repeating bars 581-584, there are short accents. In FE there is no accent in 588, which is obvious inaccuracy. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
, our alternative suggestion
at end of bar in 
