b. 569
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The additional fingering in EE only repeats the scheme indicated by Chopin in the 1st half of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 569
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In this bar, there is no musical reason to release pedal earlier than in the previous bars. Therefore, the notation of FE (→EE) is inaccurate, most probably due to lack of space under the octave in bar 570 in [A], which forced the placement of the mark still at the end of bar 569 and, consequently, a respective shift of the asterisk. In GE1 (→GE2), the notation is less misleading – the mark was placed directly before . category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 570
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The additional must be a mistake of the engraver of GE (perhaps an unfinished correction – following the erroneously printed mark on the 3rd beat of the bar, the correct indication was added, yet the wrong one was not removed. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Partial corrections |
||||||||
b. 570-571
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Fontana's fingering is identical to the one indicated by Chopin in FED; it is just more accurately written out. In the main text, we include only the undoubtedly authentic entry of the composer. category imprint: issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED |
||||||||
b. 570
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing wedge over the topmost note is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE, although one cannot exclude a later addition of the mark in the last phase of proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |