Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 314-316

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

..

In bar 314 and 316 A contains neither a  to the 3rd quaver nor a  to the top note of the octave on the 7th quaver. The inaccuracies were corrected in GE (→FE,EE,IE).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 314

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

..

In A there is no  to the bottom note of the octave on the 3rd crotchet. The inaccuracy was corrected in GE (→FE,EE,IE).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 315

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In EE there is no  marking, which obviously is an error, as in b. 319 there is an appropriate  marking.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Errors in EE

b. 315

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

EE, GC (→GE) & FE

Our suggestion

Alternative slurring

..

Shortening of passages compared with the 19 corresponding places was caused most probably by a limited scale of the grand piano, as when Scherzo was composed most models had a scale range up to f4. Therefore, in the main text we suggest completing the figuration in compliance with the corresponding places, thus the slur needs to be appropriately modified in RH.

In EE the treble clef was omitted after the last rest.

category imprint: Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information

issues: Constraint from piano range

b. 315-319

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

The slurs in the sources exemplify the figuration beginning in RH on the third beat in b. 315 and in LH in b. 316 - see the next  annotation. There are also no meaningful differences between them if we omit the imprecise notation of the slur's beginning in GC and arbitrarily added slur in LH in GE. We suggest to complete the figuration based on the corresponding places also with appropriate extention of the slur and retaining both slurring variants.

category imprint: Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information

issues: Inaccuracies in GC