|
b. 581
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of GE must be erroneous, which is supported by the logic of the course of the melodic line, confirmed by the version of analogous bar 69 and 230. Locally, the mistake is not manifest, so the reviser of EE3, having apparently a great confidence in GE, introduced that version instead of the correct text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
|||||
|
b. 581
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Omission of the wedge over G is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE3, although one also cannot exclude a revision, motivated, e.g. by the missing staccato mark in similar bar 597. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
|
b. 581-582
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 581-582
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in the previous bars, an additional slur under the L.H. part is not necessary in this layout. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 582
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE), the sharp is placed over the grupetto mark. The patent mistake was corrected in GE by removing the erroneous mark. In the main text, we move the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Annotations in FEJ , Errors repeated in EE |
in 
2 as the bottom note of the grupetto seems to be more natural than c2, and the intended mark (