b. 460
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The lack of a staccato dot over the e3-e4 octave is probably an oversight by the engraver of GE category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 460
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Division of the slur before the 2nd beat of bar 460 must be an inaccuracy of FE (→EE), since wherever analogous passages in the L.H. are encompassed with a slur (bars 452, 456 and 458), it always starts from the first, topmost note of the passage. In GE1 (→GE2), an attempt at proofreading the slurs was probably taken; however, the beginning of the second slur was moved inaccurately, on the 2nd semiquaver. Completely correct slurs, compliant with the natural shape of the figuration, were introduced in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 460
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato mark probably results from an oversight of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 460
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slur of the majority of the sources must be erroneous – omission of the last group of semiquavers could be attributed to the fact that it was entirely written on the bottom stave. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 460-461
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |