|
b. 451
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we lead the slur to the last note of the bar as in analogous bars 456, 458 and 460. Such a change was introduced already in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 451-452
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The slur of A (→FC) reaches the line ending b. 451, yet it does not go beyond it, so it is uncertain whether it is supposed to encompass the e minim in the next bar or not. In the main text we adopt the former as closer to the notation of analogous b. 349-350, in which the respective minim is certainly encompassed with a slur. This is how the slur was interpreted in FE (→EE), whereas in GE1 the slur ends on the last g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
|
b. 452
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
We regard the absence of the accent as Chopin's oversight, since the mark is present in the three remaining analogous bars – bars 412, 420 and 460. EE added a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 452
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Fontana repeated here a Chopinesque indication in the passage in bar 456, identical as far as the key scheme is concerned, and completed it, by specifying the moment of hand position change. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 452
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
in 
in 
