|
b. 437-438
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest beginning the slur earlier than in the sources due to the slur in the L.H. and slurs in analogous bars 412-413. The earlier ending of the slur in GE1 (→GE2) is most probably inaccurate, whereas the staccato dots added in GE3 are an arbitrary revision. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 437
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
|||||||||
|
b. 437-438
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In this context, the missing staccato marks must be considered an inadvertence of Chopin or the engraver of FE, which was noticed already in EE and partially – only in the R.H. – also in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 438
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE before the chord there is natural on e2. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||||
|
b. 438
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A |
raising d2 to d
2 before the 1st semiquaver. This patent inaccuracy was corrected in 
returning c
4. The harmonic context and a comparison with an identical figure four bars earlier prove Chopin's mistake. The sign was added already in