|
b. 436
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing wedge in the L.H. part is probably an oversight. Admittedly, we considered the wedge in bar 419, present only in the part of one of the hands, to be probably erroneous, yet in the case of the discussed bar there are not as many analogous situations allowing for comparisons (only bar 192), which leaves us without grounds to question the wedge in the R.H. featured in the sources. The accuracy of the change of wedges to dots in GE3 cannot be excluded – wedges do not appear among the staccato marks used in this theme by Chopin; nevertheless, according to us, it is not a sufficient argument to modify the version of the principal source. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 437-438
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In these bars, the slurs of A are shorter than before, yet they still begin on the 2nd beat of the bar, which was not repeated in the editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 437
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The traces visible in FE prove that the last semiquaver was proofread, since d category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 437
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The staccato dots were arbitrarily added by the reviser of GE3, whereas the slur was repeated after the previous bar. In the main text, we keep the slur of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), which we consider to be correct. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 437-438
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The earlier beginning of the slur in GE1 (→GE2) is most probably an inaccuracy, corrected in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
1 in 
1 was changed to c1. That version was probably an earlier edition of that place or perhaps also of earlier analogous bars 412, 413 and 436, changed still at the stage of manuscripts. In that case, it would be an overlooked proofreading of an analogous place.
