mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 302

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Small quavers in GE2 (→GE3)

Small semiquavers in GE2 (→GE3)
..

We keep the notation of the majority of the sources, in which the double grace note is written in quavers. However, in the face of A, one can ponder whether Chopin did not forget to add the top beam of the semiquaver beaming, since in analogous b. 404 all sources feature small semiquavers.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 302

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

 in GE

No mark in FE (→EE)
..

We follow GE in the main text, as in bars 43, 69 & 276.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 302

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Crotchet f1-a1 in sources

Crotchet a1 suggested by the editors
..

As was the case with b. 69, assuming an incorrect interpretation of [A], in the main text we suggest the notation of analogous b. 43.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 302-303

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

..

As in previous analogous places, in FE (→EE) the L.H. part octaves are written down in a simplified manner with the use of con 8va from the 2nd beat of b. 302 to the end of the 1st beat of b. 303.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Abbreviated notation of A

b. 302

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

..

We add cautionary naturals to the octave E1-E in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions