Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 434

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FED

Fingering written into FEH

Fingering based on FED & FEH, suggested by the editors

Fingering written into FEFo

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE

..

The concerted fingering of FEH and EE most probably corresponds to the Chopinesque one, which is confirmed by the entry in FED. See also the note to bar 410. In comparison, the differing fingering of FEFo stands out, written actually rather by the pupil than by Chopin. It does not exclude its possible authenticity, yet in the main text we take into account the remaining entries – FED and the three digits of FEH that may have been written by Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH , Annotations in FEFo

b. 434-435

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

in bar 434 in FE (→GE)

in bar 435 in EE

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 434

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Slur from quaver in FE (→GE1GE2)

Slur from semiquavers in EE & GE3

..

The range of the slurs in the left and right hands differs in FE (→GEGE2), which means that one of them is most probably inaccurate. A comparison with similar bars suggests that it is the slur in the L.H., which we adjust to the slur in the R.H. in this situation. An identical change was introduced in EE and GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 434

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Inverted long accent in A

in FC (→GE1)

in FE (→EE)

in GE2 (→GE3)

Long accent, our alternative suggestion

..

The mark in A, like in analogous b. 332, is most probably a reversed long accent, and this is the version we give in the main text. All the remaining sources reproduced it inaccurately, moving it to the right and sometimes also extending it. We suggest a common long accent as an alternative version, as written by Chopin in FC in analogous b. 332. It is likely that the change was also to apply to the discussed bar: overlooking proofreading one of the analogous places is one of Chopin's typical inaccuracies.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Inaccuracies in FC

b. 434-435

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Slur in A (→FEEE) & GE2 (→GE3)

No slur in FC (→GE1)

..

The missing slur over the written-out arpeggio is most probably an oversight of the copyist. The slur was added in GE2 (→GE3), probably on the basis of a comparison with analogous b. 332-333.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC