b. 434
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The concerted fingering of FEH and EE most probably corresponds to the Chopinesque one, which is confirmed by the entry in FED. See also the note to bar 410. In comparison, the differing fingering of FEFo stands out, written actually rather by the pupil than by Chopin. It does not exclude its possible authenticity, yet in the main text we take into account the remaining entries – FED and the three digits of FEH that may have been written by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH , Annotations in FEFo |
|||||||||||||||
b. 434-435
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||||||
b. 434
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The range of the slurs in the left and right hands differs in FE (→GE→GE2), which means that one of them is most probably inaccurate. A comparison with similar bars suggests that it is the slur in the L.H., which we adjust to the slur in the R.H. in this situation. An identical change was introduced in EE and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||
b. 434
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The mark in A, like in analogous b. 332, is most probably a reversed long accent, and this is the version we give in the main text. All the remaining sources reproduced it inaccurately, moving it to the right and sometimes also extending it. We suggest a common long accent as an alternative version, as written by Chopin in FC in analogous b. 332. It is likely that the change was also to apply to the discussed bar: overlooking proofreading one of the analogous places is one of Chopin's typical inaccuracies. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||||||||
b. 434-435
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing slur over the written-out arpeggio is most probably an oversight of the copyist. The slur was added in GE2 (→GE3), probably on the basis of a comparison with analogous b. 332-333. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |