|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The middle part of the bar, from the 3rd to the 8th note, is written in FE (→EE) with the use of an octave sign. In GE1 (→GE2), the mark was overlooked, as a result of which a corresponding fragment seems to be written an octave lower. The mistake was rectified in GE3 by moving the notes to the right pitch, like it was written in all editions in analogous bar 304. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 (→GE2), the 8th semiquaver is a d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with analogous bars 287 and 303-304 points to an inaccurate placement of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest a slur modelled after analogous bar 304. The change was introduced already in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a long accent after bar 304 as well as 287 and 303. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
2. It is a result of two overlapped mistakes – the missing octave sign (see the previous 
on 3rd beat in 
