|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Combining the slurs over the rest in bar 288, as it was done in GE1 (→FE→EE), may be considered to be justified in this case – the slurs in A look like an inaccurately written one slur. In GE2 the manuscript was interpreted correctly. In turn, in the very A the slurring of the junction of the bars, which are written on adjacent pages, is unclear. The slur in bar 288 suggests a continuation, which is not excluded at all by the slur in bar 289. However, when discussed separately, the second slur seems to be a typical slur combining a grace note with a semiquaver associated with it, hence we consider such an interpretation to be more likely and we adopt it as the text of A and the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||
|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
There is no accidental before the 7th quaver in the sources, which makes us interpret it as f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A |
||||||
|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE1→EE2) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED |
||||||
|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The version of FE1 must be erroneous, which is proved by a comparison with analogous bars 286 and 290 as well as by the proofreading of FE2 (→EE), perhaps originated by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Bars 288 and 304 are a repetition, modified accordingly, of bars 287 and 303 that precede them. Out of these 4 bars, it is only bar 288 that features the b3 note as the topmost one, which implies a possibility of a mistake. Due to this reason, in the main text we suggest an a3, like in the remaining bars. Such a correction was introduced already in GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
1. The oversight of a 
returning f1 is proved by f1 present in the viola part in 
and e1 instead of d
