mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 289

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Hairpin in FE (→GE,EE), literary reading

Long accent in FE (→GE,EE), contextual interpretation
..

In this context, the sign reproduced in FE (→GE,EE) as a hairpin is to be interpreted as a long accent.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents

b. 289-290

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In FE (→EE), in bar 290 (which opens a new great stave) the slur begins from the 1st note, even though the slur that started on the last note of the previous bar should be continued. The inaccuracy was corrected only in GE.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in EE

b. 289

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No slur in FE (→GE,EE)

Slur added by the editors
..

Like in bar 287, we add a slur over the ending of the slur in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 289

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

No slur in sources

Slur suggested by editors
..

In the main text we give the slur after a comparison with analogous b. 30, 56 and 106.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 289-293

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

 in GE

in FE (→EE)
..

The trills in b. 289 and 293 are written down in GE without a wavy line after the  mark. In the main text we give the more suggestive version of notation of FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources