|
b. 289
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The oversight of the slur in GE3 is most probably an accident. It is difficult to accept an intentional deletion of a whole-bar slur (after the next bar, in which the slur was overlooked in GE1) if in analogous bars 305-306 such whole-bar slurs were introduced contrary to the notation of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
|
b. 289-290
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the initial fragment, Fontana's fingering is unclear. We assume that it is a variant fingering for the 3rd, 4th and 5th semiquavers in bar 289. It is highly unlikely that these indications could be coming from Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 289
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In this context, the sign reproduced in FE (→GE,EE) as a category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
|||||
|
b. 289-290
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE (→EE), in bar 290 (which opens a new great stave) the slur begins from the 1st note, even though the slur that started on the last note of the previous bar should be continued. The inaccuracy was corrected only in GE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
|
b. 289
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Like in bar 287, we add a slur over the ending of the slur in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
hairpin is to be interpreted as a long accent.
