b. 360
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The finger swap marked by Fontana in EE emphasises the need for a strict realisation of the sustained bass notes in this and the next bars – see bars 361-363. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing arpeggio in FC (→GE) seems to be an oversight. However, arpeggios are also missing in analogous b. 462 and similar b. 470; therefore, it cannot be excluded that arpeggios were added in A after the completion of FC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
A (→FC→GE1, →FE→EE1) has a reminding before g1. The mark, unnecessary in this context, was removed in GE2 (→GE3) and EE2 (→EE3). The same applies to b. 462. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Last key signature sign |
|||||
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we suggest marks after analogous bar 346. Chopin wrote similar pairs of marks also in bars 342 and 356. According to us, these pairs of hairpins, as emphasising the brilliant nature of the bravura passages, are to be considered an integral part of notation. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 361-362
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In EE, the characteristic Chopinesque combination was separated; at the same time, the mark was moved to bar 362. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |