b. 360-368
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE, is under the 4th quaver. It is an inaccuracy resulting from an inept layout of text – the last quaver is placed next to the bar line. There is a similar situation in bar 364 and 368 although in the latter the inaccurate placing of the marking cannot be explained by the layout. See also bars 384-385. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The notation of accidentals in FE is inaccurate – naturals are missing before the first d1 and before d3 and g2 in the last triplet, whereas the superfluous was placed before b1 in the 2nd half of the bar. In the remaining editions, all necessary accidentals were added, while EE also removed the superfluous ones. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
||||||||
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We suggest adding an accent on the 4th quaver in the bar on the basis of a comparison with analogous bar 368. Accentuating thirds gives passages a virtuoso touch and refers to the characteristic rhythm of krakowiak . The accent was added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The fingerings of EE and FEH are certainly compliant. There is a similar situation in analogous bar 368. It does not guarantee their authenticity, although in this context one can be almost certain that it is actually a Chopinesque fingering. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |