mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 288

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

f-f1 in A (→GE) & FE2 (→EE)

d-d1 in FE1
..

The version of FE1 must be erroneous, which is proved by a comparison with analogous bars 286 and 290 as well as by the proofreading of FE2 (→EE), perhaps originated by Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 288

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

b3 in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)
 
..

Bars 288 and 304 are a repetition, modified accordingly, of bars 287 and 303 that precede them. Out of these 4 bars, it is only bar 288 that features the b3 note as the topmost one, which implies a possibility of a mistake. Due to this reason, in the main text we suggest an a3, like in the remaining bars. Such a correction was introduced already in GE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 288

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

The middle part of the bar, from the 3rd to the 8th note, is written in FE (→EE) with the use of an octave sign. In GE1 (→GE2), the mark was overlooked, as a result of which a corresponding fragment seems to be written an octave lower. The mistake was rectified in GE3 by moving the notes to the right pitch, like it was written in all editions in analogous bar 304.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 288

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In GE1 (→GE2), the 8th semiquaver is a d2. It is a result of two overlapped mistakes – the missing octave sign (see the previous note) and the Terzverschreibung error, which is confirmed by the comparison with analogous bars 287 and 303-304. The mistakes were corrected in GE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions

b. 288

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

 on 3rd beat in FE

 on 2nd beat in GE

2  in EE
..

A comparison with analogous bars 287 and 303-304 points to an inaccurate placement of the  mark in FE (→EE). A corresponding correction was introduced already in GE. In turn, in EE, another  mark was added at the beginning of the bar, which is both an arbitrary and incomprehensible revision if we take into account the compliance with the harmonic course, confirmed in the analogous bars.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions