



b. 275
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The a tempo indication added in GE3, in spite of its evident accuracy, certainly does not come from Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 275
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a staccato dot also for the chord in the L.H. Such an articulation is unquestionable; in similar contexts, Chopin would often consider marks over the R.H. to be valid also in the L.H. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 275-276
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The articulation markings in these bars are questionable. We consider the dot over the last b1 in bar 275 to be a patent mistake – attenuating the energy contained in this characteristic, octave gesture opening the theme seems to be inconceivable. However, it is unclear whether and which note the dot was supposed to apply to – the potential candidates are the previous quaver (b category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 275
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary naturals to the D-d octave. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 275-283
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we keep the notation of A, in which Chopin precisely and consistently differentiated between the types of staccato markings in the L.H., saving wedges for the bass notes only. This subtlety was not preserved by GE (→FE,EE), in which all markings were reproduced as wedges. See also bar 276 and 279. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |