data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The crossings-out in A prove that Chopin initially wrote here an octave, like in analogous bars. This explains to a certain extent the two-part notation of the E-d seventh in the next bar. It could have influenced the perception of the engraver of GE1 of this place, both in terms of the ties in b. 274-275 and the top note of the L.H. part in the discussed bar. However, neither a common mistake nor, which is least likely, a revision unifying the text with the version of b. 294 can be ruled out. The correct text was restored in GE2 (→GE3).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE, GE revisions
notation: Pitch