|
b. 325-327
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A bar 325 is the last one on the page. The slur in the L.H. clearly suggests a continuation (similarly as the slur in the R.H.), which, however, is absent on a new page (in bar 326). In GE1 (→FE→EE) the slur was completely overlooked, whereas in GE2 the slur of A together with the overlooked ending was restored. Since this is how Chopin's intention undoubtedly looked like, in this case in the main text we include the slur of GE2. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 325
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Frequent changes of accents from horizontal to vertical is one of the characteristic revisions of EE – cf. e.g. bar 320. In this case, vertical accents were consistently introduced also in the next three bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 325
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE1), there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
|
b. 325
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Both in EE and FEH, the bar was provided with fingering very carefully, applying the same rule for the top notes of the thirds – the 1st finger on a white key, the 2nd – on a black one (cf. bars 322-324). The fingering of the bottom notes is also very similar – the 3rd finger on a black key and the 4th – on a white one; however, in FEH, the rule is modified when two subsequent white keys appear. As a result, both fingerings differ only in the digit applying to e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
|
b. 325-326
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The extended ending of the slur in FE in bar 325 – in that source it is the last bar on the page – suggests its continuation, unconfirmed, however, by the slurless first half of bar 326. The comparison with analogous bars 321-322 (as well as 329-330) proves that the slur should be continued to the 4th semiquaver of the next bar. The revisers of GE and EE deemed the end of slur in bar 325 inaccurate, and shortened it. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
restoring a2 in the last pair of semiquavers. This patent inadvertence was added in 
before c
3, which does not seem to be necessary. In turn, we preserve the formally unnecessary 
