b. 324
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we omit the cautionary before d2. It may be a remaining element of an earlier orthography of the previous triplet, in which the top notes were written as d2, same as in bar 320. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
b. 324
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary before the a2 crotchet. The mark was added also in EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 324
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FEH, the fingering digits for the 5th and 4th last semiquavers – 1-2 – are written twice, with different pencils. Since it was the same digits that were written twice, it seems that the person who was writing them for the second time did not notice the notation or wanted to enhance its legibility. In both cases, one of the writing persons could have been Chopin, hence we include those digits in the main text. The fingering digit given for the 9th semiquaver in EE is most probably erroneous – we are almost certainly talking about the 2nd finger and not third, as the digit '2' should be understood in the English system of marking fingers. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in EE , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
b. 324
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, a slur led only to the 3rd semiquaver is certainly inaccurate. This was amended by the revisers of GE and EE. There is a similar situation in bar 328. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 324
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
EE added a cautionary before f2, which is, according to us, unnecessary. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |