



b. 269
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The mark written in FED underlines the significance of the rest and, consequently, it suggests the need to emphasise the syncopation as the beginning of a new motif of a probably different emotional nature. category imprint: Source & stylistic information |
||||||||
b. 269-270
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Interpretation of the mark of FE (→EE) is unclear. When interpreted literally, it is a short accent under a tied note, which does not make sense on the piano. According to us, the course of music suggests a long accent on the syncopated g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 269
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
 
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 269-270
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Both fingerings appearing in the sources are compliant in terms of the 5-4-5 succession of fingers at the top of the passage, typical of Chopin. In the descending part of the passage, FEH gives a crossing-over of the 5th finger, which also belongs to the range of Chopinesque fingering options – cf. the Impromptu in A category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
b. 269
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Source & stylistic information |