



b. 267
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the majority of the sources, the R.H. text on the 1st beat of the bar contains a rhythmic mistake. However, we give the text in this form, since it is impossible to say which elements are written incorrectly and therefore which rhythm Chopin meant. In the main text we give the version of AsI, since it is undoubtedly authentic, rhythmically correct and natural, both aesthetically and pianistically. However, as Chopin did not repeat the version of AsI, he could have wanted to change it then. The alternative versions are two possible reconstructions of a rhythm that could have been intended by Chopin. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||
b. 267
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the version of AsI and A (→GE→FESB) the dot prolonging g category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions , Dotted or even rhythm , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||
b. 267
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In A (→GE→FE,EE) the penultimate note is prolonged to the value of a quaver, which must be a mistake in this context. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||
b. 267
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The missing vertical accent is probably an oversight by the engraver of FESB. See also the next two notes in this bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||
b. 267
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The missing grace note is probably an oversight by the engraver of FESB; in this bar, he also overlooked 2 accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |