b. 324-325
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in bars 321-322, Chopin did not write in A accidentals to the last semiquaver of each beat of these bars. All necessary accidentals were already added in GE (→FE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
b. 325
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Just like in the case of other execution markings in this part (form b. 327), no in FE may have been Chopin's momentary lack of focus while writing [A2]. Since there is no in any of the sources, we propose appropriate supplementation in b. 339. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 325
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats before d2 in the R.H. and D in the L.H. When reading less carefully, it would be tempting to use a diminished four-note chord, well liked by Chopin, which, to a certain extent, is confirmed by the written before d2 in the 1st violin part in Morch. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||
b. 325-333
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The additional slurs in bars 325 and 333 must be a revision of EE. Such double slurs were added also in the places where they are absent in the previous sources – cf. bars 326-328 and 334. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 325
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In this case – cf. bar 313 – a return to tempo primo at the recapitulation of the main theme is obvious to the pianist. However, it is not that obvious to the strings, performing a non-characteristic accompaniment. This explains the omission of a tempo in A (→GE→FE→EE). In the main text we suggest it in a variant form. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |