mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 304

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In GE, the engraver overlooked the staccato dot for the 1st quaver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 304-308

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No marks in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Dots & accents in GE3
..

In this case, the staccato dots and accents added in GE3 in bars 304, 306 and 308 may be considered justified – they are authentic indications present in the R.H. in analogous bars 76, 78 and 80.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 304-306

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In the main text, we add a cautionary  before b​​​​​​​1 in bars 304 and 306.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 304-309

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Triplet-slurs in FE (→GE,EE)

No extra slurs – our suggestion
..

category imprint: Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information

issues: Triplet slurs

b. 304-305

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

No slur in GE & FE (→EE)

Slur suggested by editors
..

The absence of the slur in the sources was most probably caused by Chopin's oversight in [A]. More details in the note to b. 19-20.

category imprint: Editorial revisions