b. 393-398
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In EE, f1 is tied both in bars 393-394 and 397-398. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 393
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||||
b. 394
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing in GE in bars 393-394 is most probably a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 394
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The hairpin in EE is most probably an addition of a revision based on comparison with the analogous motifs in bars 386, 390 and 396. After all, one can ponder whether the mark in FE (→EE) is misplaced in bars 393-394, i.e. instead of in bar 394. However, the shape of the phrase in bars 393-396, different than in the previous four-bar sections, constitutes an argument against such a hypothesis; this phrase is clearly focused on the central e2 note, repeated at the beginning of each of three subsequent bars. The markings in the version of FE emphasise each of the notes: in bar 394 – , in bar 395 – the long accent, in bar 396 – the beginning of the slur. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 394-395
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing pedal change at the transition between the bars must be an inadvertence. Consequently, inaccuracies in pedalling marks may be assumed also in bars 390, 398 and 399, although in that cases, they do not suggest an erroneous performance. A corresponding addition was introduced both in GE and EE (in the latter, inaccurately). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |