b. 303
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
There is no slur in GE3, which must be an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 303
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2) and EE, the notation of the first two semiquavers is probably erroneous. Although the traces of corrections in print point to a proofreading of this place, it seems, however, that it was a more serious mistake that was corrected, concerning beams, whereas the result may be a compromise between Chopin's intention and the engraver's convenience. Due to this reason, in the main text we repeat the undeniable notation of analogous bar 287. An identical revision was introduced in GE3. In this context, the reversed beams in EE, apparently without influence on the musical sense, may suggest a different arrangement of voices than the notation of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 303
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Both here and in b. 305 Chopin crossed out the marks in A and replaced them with double grace notes, like in b. 278 & 280. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A |
||||||||
b. 303
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we include the c notes added in the four quaver chords at the time of proofreading of FE (→EE), almost certainly by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 303
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In GE the trill is written down without a wavy line after the mark. In the main text we give the more suggestive version of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources |