|
b. 240-254
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
|
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Chopin would encompass rests within phrases with a slur a number of times, e.g. in bar 245 and 249. However, this is not that kind of situation, hence the continuous FE slur is almost certainly a mistake, perhaps resulting from the inaccurate slurs of [FC]. It was considered a mistake already in EE. In the main text we give the unequivocal A slurs (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||
|
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The last R.H. quaver in FE1 is an f2-b category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 240-246
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In A the L.H. part is written in shorthand – only top octave notes and the con 8 - - - indication. GE (→FE,EE) wrote the octaves in full only in bars 240-243; it was only IE that wrote the entire section in full. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Abbreviated octaves' notation , |
|||||
|
b. 240
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The EE2 version resulted from a misunderstanding of the original notation – the reviser changed the writing from three-part to two-part. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
2 fourth, which is a mistake. It was corrected – perhaps at Chopin's request – in 
