|
b. 359-366
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we present - thanks to the range of a dashed line - a more accurate application of the marking from GC. In GE the dashed line was omitted and the abbreviated marking accel. was written out as acceler. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 359-360
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The interlocking slurs of FE are probably a result of inaccuracies related to, e.g. the transition into a new line in [A] (cf. bars 13-14). The fact of separating them in GE3 adjusted them to the slurs in bars 357-358, probably inauthentic. In the main text, we give one slur, compliant with the motif's structure and confirmed by authentic slurs in analogous bars 358-359 as well as 14-15 and 17-19. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 359
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, the slur begins on the last note of the bar, yet it is not continued in the next bar, printed on a new page. That inaccuracy possibly explains the overlooked slur in EE (unless it is a mere oversight). In the main text, we include the slur of FE (→GE) and consider the notation of the beginning of bar 360 to be inaccurate. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 359
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of GE is most probably a Terzverschreibung error – cf. similar bar 367. A mistake can be provoked by both f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
||||||||
|
b. 359
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
in 
before that note in 
