



b. 241
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
There is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 241
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Nothing points to a possible authenticity of the version of EE. It is probably a revision by analogy with b. 261 or a mistake, e.g. an unfinished correction of the e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 241-242
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
According to us, both source versions can be authentic, although mistakes cannot be ruled out:
Due to the above reason, in the main text we suggest a variant solution. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 241
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The whole-bar slur of GE probably resulted from an erroneous interpretation of the inaccurate slur of [A]. Chopin would generally start slurs running from a note written in notes tied by one or a few ties either from the first or last of those notes, but never the middle one. In the absence of a slur in FE (→EE), in the main text we refer to an analogous situation in b. 182. In the version of GE in which b is tied twice, the suggested slur is tantamount to the one written down in the source. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||
b. 241
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In EE1 the dots extending the b1-g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |