|
b. 239-240
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The absence of the L.H. slur is probably due to an oversight by the engraver of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 239
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in bar 127, in the main text we propose in variant form (in brackets) the ending of the trill that appears in the 1st violin part in GEork (→FEork). category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 239-241
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we do not include the inauthentic fingering concerning the L.H. octaves, added by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 239-240
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The meaning of the 3 slurs/ties in bar 239 visible in A (→GE→EE) is unclear, since they are not continued in the next bar, which opens a new line. One can see them as "tenuto-slurs", sometimes found in Chopin's autographs or as unfinished ties (to e category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: FE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation , Tenuto slurs , |
||||||||
|
b. 239-240
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The range of the A slur is uncertain – in bar 239, at the end of a line, the slur suggests that it should be continued, yet in bar 240 there is no ending thereof. As was the case with the R.H. slur, we interpret the ending of the slur as reaching the end of the passage (the c1 crotchet), and this is the slur we provide in the main text. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Uncertain slur continuation , Inaccuracies in A |
1 and c2) and an articulation-motivic slur (the third slur, the middle one). According to us, the second possibility is more likely – overlooked endings of the ties and the slur – and this is the version, introduced also by 
