Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 239-240

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

..

In AImaz the bass sequence is placed an octave higher than in the final version, in which the interval of a tenth between the bass and the bottom notes of the R.H. chords is also kept in b. 180-181.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Bass register changes

b. 239-240

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Slur in GE & FE

No slur in EE

..

The absence of the L.H. slur is probably due to an oversight by the engraver of EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 239

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

Trill without ending in AsI & A (→GEFE,EE,FESB)

Our variant suggestion

..

As in bar 127, in the main text we propose in variant form (in brackets) the ending of the trill that appears in the 1st violin part in GEork (→FEork).

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 239-241

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I

No fingering in A (→GEFE,IE)

Fingering in EE

..

In the main text we do not include the inauthentic fingering concerning the L.H. octaves, added by EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 239-240

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I

Slurs in A (→GEEE), literal reading

Ties in FE & IE

Ties, our alternative suggestion

..

The meaning of the 3 slurs/ties in bar 239 visible in A (→GEEE) is unclear, since they are not continued in the next bar, which opens a new line. One can see them as "tenuto-slurs", sometimes found in Chopin's autographs or as unfinished ties (to e1 and c2) and an articulation-motivic slur (the third slur, the middle one). According to us, the second possibility is more likely – overlooked endings of the ties and the slur – and this is the version, introduced also by FE and IE, that we provide in the main text. An alternative suggestion would be a version of notation facilitating the interpretation, in which the middle slur was omitted, suggesting that a1 should be tied as well.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: FE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation , Tenuto slurs ,