



b. 239-240
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE and GC (→GE) the lower note of the L.H. octave, D category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC , Abbreviated octaves' notation |
||||||||||
b. 239-243
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC, the slur ending in bar 239 – the last bar on the page of that manuscript – allows for several possible interpretations. As the version of that source we give the one that is the closest to the literal reading of the text, i.e. slur reaching the end of that bar. This is how it was reproduced in GE. Other possible interpretations include: slur continuation into bar 240 (version of FE) and closing the slur on f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||
b. 239
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
Chopin added the indication leggiero in FEG (→GE) and in the base text to EE, whereas category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of GE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||||
b. 239
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The descending bass line in two previous bars suggests the use of a B category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Constraint from piano range |
||||||||||
b. 239-241
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The absence of the staccato dot over the 2nd crotchet in bar 239 in EE may be linked to the addition of slurs, however, according to us, the authenticity of the dot's omission is not certain – the engraver of EE could have overlooked it or considered it to be superfluous with relation to the added slur. Due to the fact that the added slurs are of a phrasing character in this texture (and not articulation), in the main text we suggest dots in both analogous bars 239 and 241. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |