mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 230

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Pedalling in A & GE2

Pedalling in GE1 (→FE→EE)
..

The  signs, written slightly inaccurately in A, were misinterpreted in GE1 (→FE→EE). The correct interpretation was introduced in GE2. Justification of our interpretation – see analogous bar 228. 

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 230

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

No indication in FE (→EE1→EE2)

in GE & EE3

Our variant suggestion
 
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 230

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

 

a tempo in GE & EE2 (→EE3)

Our variant suggestion
..

The a tempo indication must have been overlooked by the engraver (or Chopin). The revisers of GE and EE2 (→EE3) added it in a justified manner, probably by comparing the notation with analogous bar 118.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 230-234

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

In the main text we add cautionary flats before b3 and a3 in bars 230 and 234.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 230

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

The engravers of GE and EE overlooked the ending of the slur in the L.H. while transitioning to a new great stave (bar 230 opens a new line). It belongs to the most frequent mistakes.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Uncertain slur continuation