Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 230

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

m.s. over g1 in A & EE

m.s. over 9th semiquaver in GE (→FE)

..

The indication to perform gwith the L.H. was moved in GE (→FE) to the beginning of 2nd half of the bar. A comparison with analogous bars 226, 234, 236, 238 and 240 proves that it is a mistake. The correct division between the hands was guessed in EE

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE

b. 230

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No mark in A (→GE)

Accent in FE (→EE)

..

The missing accent over gin A (→GE) must be considered Chopin's oversight – the accents are present in five remaining similar bars. The composer's distraction could have been caused by corrections in this place. The sign added in FE (→EE) is most probably a result of Chopin's proofreading, although one can ponder why the composer – since he already took care of the accents in this bar – did not complete the remaining deficiencies

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 230

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Pedalling in A & GE2

Pedalling in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

The  signs, written slightly inaccurately in A, were misinterpreted in GE1 (→FEEE). The correct interpretation was introduced in GE2. Justification of our interpretation – see analogous bar 228

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 230

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

No indication in FE (→EE1EE2)

in GE & EE3

Our variant suggestion
 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 230

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

 

a tempo in GE & EE2 (→EE3)

Our variant suggestion

..

The a tempo indication must have been overlooked by the engraver (or Chopin). The revisers of GE and EE2 (→EE3) added it in a justified manner, probably by comparing the notation with analogous bar 118.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions