|
b. 321-322
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs of FE (→GE1→GE2) at the transition between bars 321 and 322 are inaccurate and unclear. The slur over the 3rd beat of bar 321 runs from the b1 crotchet to the last semiquaver of that bar, whereas the beginning of the slur in bar 322, opening a new line of text, suggests continuation from the previous bar. According to us, both slurs are inaccurate; in the main text, we clarify them, taking advantage of the similarity between bars 321 and 319-320 – we assign the slur in bar 321 to the bottom voice and start the slur in bar 322 from the beginning of that bar. This solution was adopted already in EE. In turn, GE3 considered only the slur in bar 321 to be inaccurate; it was changed in such a way, so that the beginning of the slur in bar 322 was meaningful. This version, offering quite an advantageous phrasing (cf. the slur in the L.H. in bars 321-322), may be considered an alternative interpretation of FE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 321-325
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 321-326
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In bars 321-322 and 325-326, quaver rests filling the rhythmic values of the top voice were added in EE and GE3. We preserve the sparing notation, typical of Chopin, avoiding excessive formalism. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 321
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we include the fingering digits of FEFo, probably coming from Chopin. They define the fingering scheme for the R.H. for three subsequent bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEFo |
|||||||
|
b. 321-322
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In FE b. 321 ends a line, while the slur reaches the last semiquaver only. However, in a new line, in b. 322 the slur clearly suggests that it should be continued. EE considered the latter to be inaccurate, whereas according to us, it is more likely that it is the slur of FE that was supposed to be continuous, like the one of GE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Uncertain slur continuation |
before f
2 in bars 321 and 325. The latter was added already in 
