|
b. 320-321
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Both versions may be authentic, yet each may also inaccurately convey the notation of the manuscript. Engravers would eagerly adjust slurs to rhythmic values or beams (e.g. this is how the slur of FE was shortened in EE here), which makes us approach the notation of GE with caution. On the other hand, the engraver of FE could have, e.g. swapped the slurs in this and the next bar – see b. 321-322. Out of these equal variants, to the main text we choose the version of the principal source, i.e. FE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||
|
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||
|
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The left-out accent and wedges must be a mistake by FE and FESB. In the case of FE1 (→FE2), according to us, the possible reason could be – as in the previous bar – the introduction of the ossia più facile version, marked by the use of a smaller font (see the note in bar 319). category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The missing slur in FE must be a mistake, as in the case of the accent and wedges – see the previous note. category imprint: Differences between sources |
in 
to E. In the next two bars the sources contain respective accidentals.
