|
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of FE is almost certainly erroneous: both the missing interval of an octave before the topmost note of the passage and repetition of this note disrupt the regular melodic and pianistic nature of the figuration – cf. analogous phrases in bars 221 and 228-231. The correction of the text in the remaining editions was most probably introduced on the basis of comparison with the analogous bars. Moreover, a correction is written also in FEH; however, it was not the sixth but the seventh semiquaver that was changed, probably by mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
|
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FEH, a '1' was initially written over the 2nd quaver (by mistake? – cf. bar 228), which was then changed to a '5'. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
before a3. In turn, we omit the 
before e
2 in the main text.