|
b. 226
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The chord featuring a 4th note, c1, is most probably a mistake in the interpretation of the manuscript committed either by Fontana in [FC] or by the engraver of FE1. In all 10 analogous places the chord played in the middle of the bar is an exact repetition of the chord from the beginning of the bar, but an octave higher. In the discussed place this rule is also observed in the A version (→GE). Determining the presence of a middle note of a chord written on a ledger line is a frequent issue when interpreting Chopinesque autographs (this also applies to Fontana's copies). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Uncertain notes on ledger lines |
|||||
|
b. 226
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||
|
b. 226
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 226
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
Due to the reasons discussed in analogous bar 66, in the main text we add a dot prolonging the g1 crotchet, left out by the sources, probably by inadvertence. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors of A |
|||||
|
b. 226
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
raising a
to a was overlooked. The mistake was corrected in 
