|
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The oversight of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Chopin precisely added accidentals in this bar, together with cautionary naturals before a1 (twice – in the R.H. in the marked place and in the L.H. at the end of the bar) and g2. The first of them seems to be superfluous in this place and it was removed already in GE2. In the main text we add a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
|
b. 225-226
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Three naturals are missing in A – before the bottom note of the 1st octave in bar 225 and before the last quaver in bar 225 (a1) and 226 (b1). These patent inaccuracies were corrected in GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 225-227
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The division of the slur into 3 parts – contrary to the unmistakable notation of A – is an example of a characteristic manner of the engraver of GE1, who avoided long slurs. GE2 restored the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 225-227
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In GE and EE, there is no little slur for the ending of the trill in bars 225 and 226-227. The missing slurs in GE could be justified by the fact that they were added only in the last proofreading of FE, whereas in EE it could have been an oversight of the engraver. In EE2, the reviser introduced slurs encompassing the main note and the ending of the trill, but only in bars 226-227. The slur in bar 225 was added in EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
in 
before a
2. 
