mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 299-300

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In A Chopin forgot to return the bass clef in bar 300. GE1 overlooked also the treble clef in bar 299. The mistakes were corrected – perhaps by Chopin – in FE (→EE). GE2 also includes the correct text.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 299-300

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Short accents in A (→GE→FE)

Vertical accents in EE
..

The change of the font of the accents in the R.H. in bars 299-300 is an example of a characteristic discretion of EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 299

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

No sign in A (→GE→FE)

Longer  in EE

Shorter , our alternative suggestion
..

We give the version of A (→GE→FE) in the main text, since the absence of  may be considered a subtle indication that it is already bars 299-300 that are to be performed slightly milder. However, allowing the possibility that Chopin committed a mistake, we suggest an alternative proposal, i.e. adding a  hairpin by analogy to bars 293, 295 and 297. The accent over c1, written in this bar in A, suggests that Chopin envisaged a gradual attenuation of the expression of this motif only from bar 301, together with rallentando. Cf. bars 293-295. The sign in EE is most probably a part of a revision unifying the markings after analogous bars 293 and 295.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 299-301

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

3  in FE (→EE)

No markings in GE1 (→GE2)

3  in GE3
..

The missing marks in GE1 (→GE2) are probably a result of inadvertence of the engraver of GE1 – cf. the notes in bar 300. The addition in GE3 was based on the  mark in bar 285, probably erroneous.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 299

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No slur in FE (→GE1→GE2)

Slur in EE & GE3
..

Omission of the slur in the L.H. only in the first out of four similar bars must be considered an inaccuracy. The slur was added in EE and GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions