Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 216

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

Different accents in GC (→GE)

No marks in FE

Long accent in EE

..

As in bar 28, in the main text we give the notation in GC (→GE) which raises no reservations. The lack of accents in FE is certainly a mistake, and the mark in EE – most probably a long accent – a complement likely by Chopin.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of EE

b. 216

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

Slur in GC (→GE) & EE2

No slur in FE (→EE1)

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 216-217

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

..

The slur over the pair of octaves is overlooked in FE1. The mistake was corrected already in FE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions

b. 216

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text we add a cautionary at e(Chopin wrote the corresponding accidental in bar 215).

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Cautionary accidentals

b. 216

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

a-c1-e1 in GC & FE (→EE)

a-e1 in GE

..

The absence of c1 in GE in the last crotchet is most probably the oversight by the engraver, influenced by similar figures in the preceding bars.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE