|
b. 216
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In A there is no category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 216
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In all sources except GE4 redundant category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||
|
b. 216-219
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
As the main text we give the definitely correct slur of EE. The slur of GC is not accurate and, when read literally, it only embraces three bars, which is what we can see in GE. Moreover, GE - just like FE - has the slur moved to the bottom and placed under the note heads. That revision, typically introduced by engravers, is not without influence on the meaning of that articulation mark. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||
|
b. 216-219
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
We give the consistent version of two out of three autograph-based sources, i.e. EE and FE. Shortening - in relation to GC – of the hairpin sign in GE was probably due to the fact that bar 219 was the first bar on a new page in that edition. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 216-217
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The placement of crescendo differs slightly in particular sources. In FEG Chopin added cresc. under the last quaver in bar 216, and this is how it was reproduced by the engraver of GE1. In the next editions, GE2 (→GE3), the indication was moved slightly to the left, starting on the last quaver in bar 216. In EE the word crescendo was divided into syllables, which is a characteristic revision of the editor, and it was started at the end of bar 216. In the main text we adopt the indication of FE1, beginning in bar 217. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of GE , Authentic corrections of EE |
lowering g to g
in the LH part.
in 