mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 250

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text we omit the  present in A (→GE1→FE→EE) before the 1st note in the 2nd half of the bar. The unnecessarily repeated sign was removed in GE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals

b. 250

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

No slur in FE (→GE,EE1)
 

Slur in EE2 (→EE3)
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 250

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

No signs in FE (→GE,EE1)

Staccato dots in EE2 (→EE3)
..

In EE2 (→EE3), the reviser arbitrarily added staccato dots for the R.H. in the 2nd half of bar 250 – probably by comparison with similar melodic and rhythmic figures in the adjacent bar. Assuming the legitimacy of this addition, it is impossible, however, to understand why he did not introduce a similar solution in analogous bar 136 or why the marks are only in the R.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 250-252

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

Three necessary accidentals are missing in A – flats lowering g1 to g1 in bar 250, c3 to c3 in bar 251 and c4 to c4 in bar 252. The first of them was added in GE1 (→FE→EE, →GE2), whereas the third – in EE and GE2. The flat in bar 251 is not featured in any of the sources.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A

b. 250-251

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

g tied in A & GE2

g repeated in GE1 (→FE→EE)
..

The missing tie of g must be a mistake of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions