mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 249

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

in A (→GE)

in FE (→EE)
..

 instead of  is most probably a mistake of the engraver of FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , fz – f

b. 249-250

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Long accents in A

Short accents in GE (→FE→EE)
..

Shorter accents over f2 in bar 249 and g2 in bar 250 is a result of problems of the engraver of GE1 with identification of Chopin long accents.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE

b. 249

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No sign in FE (→GE1→GE2)

 in EE & GE3

[] suggested by the editors
..

The missing  mark in FE (→GE1→GE2) must be a mistake, one of a few in this fragment. It was added in the remaining editions.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , No pedal release mark

b. 249

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Short accent in sources

Long accent suggested by the editors
..

In this context, a short accent is almost certainly a result of misunderstanding Chopin's notation. In bar 225, Chopin used a long accent, in bar 233 – a vertical one; therefore, in the discussed bar he probably meant a long accent. 

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents

b. 249-250

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH