



b. 153
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slur in FE (→EE) is most probably inaccurate, hence in the main text, we give the version of GE, which, according to us, guesses correctly Chopin's possible notation. Too spacious slurs, written with a flourish, are a frequent phenomenon in the Chopinesque autographs. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 153
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||
b. 153-154
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Taking into account the authentic slurs encompassing analogous pairs of the L.H. chords between b. 152-153, 154-155 and 155-156, in the main text we suggest a corresponding addition in this place. A similar slur was also added in EE. In turn, GE2 (→GE3) placed the added slur under the chords; to differentiate it from the tie of b category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 153-157
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
FE feature long accents under the last quaver in b. 153, 154 and 156. GE reproduced them as a short category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
b. 153-154
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The two ones entered by Chopin into FED in b. 154 indicate a fingering foreseen for an identical passage in b. 153 too. In accordance with the General Editorial Principles, p. 17, in the main text we give them in b. 153. After all, FED includes a mark in this bar; it is probably another one, over g2 (unless it is a printing defect). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |