Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 153-154

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I

Slur in b. 154 in A, literal reading

Slur from b. 153 in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

..

In the main text we provide the A slur in its literal interpretation. However, the interpretation adopted by the editions is by all means reasonable and recommendable as such, particularly in the face of numerous inaccuracies of A in terms of slurs – see, e.g. the note on bars 148-153.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions

b. 153

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text we omit the  to c2 in the 2nd half of the bar, repeated without any apparent justification.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Cautionary accidentals

b. 153

composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major

d2 in chord in FE (→EE)

c2 in chord in GE

..

Both versions are musically satisfying, in all respects; we cannot say anything definitive about possible corrections either – two possibilities could be likely: a change in the last stage of proofreading FE (→EE) and possible Chopinesque proofreading of GE. On the other hand, one cannot exclude a mistake by the GE engraver, who could have considered the middle notes of the last two chords to be identical (the discussed note is placed in FE too low). In the main text we provide the undoubtedly authentic FE version, perhaps the latest one. The GE version can be regarded as a potentially authentic variant.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of GE

b. 154-155

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

 FE and GE have a double bar line between those bars. In the case of GE, this is definitely a revision (in GC, its base text, the bar line is single). This makes us suspect that the version of FE may also result from a routine editorial revision. Chopin used double bar lines infrequently and never treated them as necessarily connected with the change of key. 

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: GE revisions , FE revisions

b. 154-155

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In #KG, the tie sustaining a flat is only present in bar 155 (in a new line). This was probably the reason why GE1 did not have it at all. The error was corrected in GE2.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC