mUltimate Chopin

Op. 22, Polonaise

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Annotations in FED

b. 51

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

No mark in FE (→GE,EE)
..

According to us, the accent was added here – probably by Chopin – due to the absence of the slurs, overlooked in FE (see the note below). In the main text we do not include this mark, since we add the slurs, and it is impossible to decide whether Chopin, upon seeing them, would have added an accent.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 55

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Synchronization sign written into FED

No teaching indication
..

In the main text we give the synchronisation mark that comes from Chopin; it requires the first grace note, e1, to be performed simultaneously with bass E1. The same in b. 199, since due to the defect of FED (missing two pages), the entry in b. 55 is also in b. 199.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Synchronization markings

b. 87

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 91

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 92

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED