|
b. 201
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The sources are lacking in the accidental before the 2nd played note of the run, which must be Chopin's mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 201
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 57, the version of EE is most probably the initial one, changed in FE (→GE) in the last stage of proofreading, yet a revision of EE cannot be entirely ruled out. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 201
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Like in b. 57, the way the L.H. and the R.H. are aligned almost certainly suggests a mistake, since it results in harmonic discrepancy. Therefore, in the main text we arrange the L.H. part in accordance with the rhythmic values of the first two R.H. notes. In addition, in the main text we suggest adding a L.H. slur after a similar figure from the preceding bar as well as in b. 17-18. The slur was also added in EE, running from the first out of two semiquavers. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 201
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 57, we consider the missing slur over the accompanying L.H. figure to be Chopin's oversight. The slur was also added in EE. See the next note. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 201-202
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In FE the tie to b was inaccurately reproduced, as a result of which it looks like a slur meant to combine d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Tie or slur |
2 in 
1-b in 