mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 195

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

..

We add a cautionary  before e2 in the main text. The accidental was also added in GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 195-196

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

No slur in AsI

Slur from g1-b2 in A, literal reading

Slur from 2nd chord after A

Slur from e2 in A (contextual interpretation→GE→FE,EE)

Slur from e2 after GE (→FE,EE)
..

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 196

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

 
 
..

In IE and A there is no accent on the first beat of the bar. In IE it may have been omitted but in A this part is illegible due to the charred manuscript, so we cannot be certain whether Chopin notated an accent here or not. We can assume however that in A the accent was notated as it can be found in all the remaining sources.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

b. 196-197

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

..  

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

b. 196

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

..

Almost the whole RH part in b. 196 is illegible due to the charred manuscript A. We can deduce it content based on the corresponding b. 212 and FC3.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness