mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 195

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Slur to bar 196 in A & GE2

No slur in GE1 (→FE→EE)
..

In the main text we give the slur of A, embracing the entire phrase marked con anima in bars 195-196. GE1 (→FE→EE) reproduced only the part embracing bar 196, perhaps due to the erroneous reproduction of the tie of a1 as a slur.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 195

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

In A there is no  lowering c1 to c1. This patent oversight was corrected already in GE1 (→FE→EE, →GE2), perhaps by Chopin. Moreover, a cautionary  before c1 was added in the next bar. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of GE

b. 195

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

g1 in chord in FE (→EE)

e1 in chord in GE
..

There is no indication that the version of GE could be possibly authentic; it is most probably a typical example of the Terzverschreibung error.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error

b. 195

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Arpeggio sign in FE (→EE)

No sign in GE
..

In GE, there is no apreggio mark before the 2nd chord of the bar, which is most probably an oversight of the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 195-210

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

category imprint: